Finance · Markets
Global Traders Turn to Perpetual Futures for China Tech Access
International investors are using leveraged derivatives to bypass traditional channels and gain exposure to Chinese AI and robotics companies like Unitree

KEY TAKEAWAYS
- ·International investors are using perpetual futures contracts, originally popular in crypto markets, to gain leveraged exposure to Chinese tech stocks like Unitree Robotics.
- ·These cash-settled derivatives bypass traditional access barriers such as capital controls and listing restrictions that limit foreign participation in mainland IPOs.
- ·Leverage ratios of 10x to 100x amplify both gains and losses, raising concerns among regulators about speculative risk and market fragmentation.
Derivatives as a Backdoor
International investors have found a new route into China's booming technology sector: perpetual futures contracts. These highly leveraged derivatives, which originated in cryptocurrency trading, are now being deployed to gain exposure to Chinese AI and robotics companies that would otherwise remain difficult to access through conventional channels.
The instruments, commonly called "perps," function as futures contracts without expiration dates. Unlike traditional futures that require periodic rolling or settlement, perpetual contracts let traders maintain speculative positions indefinitely. Originally designed for Bitcoin and other digital assets, these derivatives have expanded to cover commodities such as gold and, more recently, individual equities.
For offshore investors, stock-linked perpetual futures have become particularly useful as a workaround to participate in Chinese IPOs. Unitree Robotics, a humanoid robot manufacturer, represents one prominent example where traders outside mainland China have used perps to establish positions around the company's public listing.
Why Traditional Access Remains Constrained
Direct ownership of Chinese technology stocks continues to present obstacles for international capital. Regulatory restrictions, capital controls, and listing venue complexities often limit foreign participation in mainland equity offerings. Even when companies list on Hong Kong exchanges or through offshore vehicles, allocation processes can favor domestic or institutional buyers.
Perpetual futures sidestep these barriers. Because the contracts are cash-settled derivatives rather than direct equity holdings, they exist outside the traditional stock ownership framework. Offshore platforms offering perps typically operate in less regulated jurisdictions, enabling retail and institutional traders to take leveraged positions on Chinese stocks without navigating mainland brokerage requirements or quota systems.
The timing aligns with surging global interest in artificial intelligence. Chinese firms working on robotics, large language models, and autonomous systems have attracted significant attention, yet many remain inaccessible to foreign retail investors. Perps offer a speculative avenue to capture price movements tied to these companies, even if the underlying shares are not directly available.
Leverage Cuts Both Ways
Perpetual futures carry embedded leverage, often ranging from 10x to 100x, depending on the platform and asset. This amplification can generate outsized returns when bets align with price direction, but losses accumulate just as rapidly. The funding rate mechanism, which keeps perp prices anchored to spot prices, adds another layer of cost or income depending on whether a trader holds a long or short position.
For traders chasing momentum in Chinese tech names, the leverage can be attractive. A modest uptick in Unitree's valuation, for instance, translates into magnified gains for perp holders. But the same dynamic applies in reverse. A pullback in sentiment or negative news can trigger margin calls and forced liquidations, particularly for retail participants with limited capital buffers.
Market observers note that the rise of stock-linked perps also introduces fragmentation. Price discovery for Chinese tech stocks now occurs across multiple venues: onshore A-shares, Hong Kong listings where applicable, and offshore derivative platforms. This can create arbitrage opportunities but also complicates the assessment of true demand and valuation.
Regulatory Scrutiny Ahead
Financial regulators in several jurisdictions have begun examining perpetual futures markets more closely. The European Securities and Markets Authority and the UK's Financial Conduct Authority have issued warnings about the risks of highly leveraged crypto derivatives, and similar scrutiny may extend to stock-linked products as their use grows.
China's own regulatory stance remains ambiguous. While Beijing has tightened oversight of offshore capital flows and cross-border fintech platforms, perps linked to Chinese equities operate largely beyond its direct reach. If these instruments are perceived to facilitate speculative capital inflows or outflows, authorities may seek coordination with offshore regulators or impose indirect restrictions.
For now, the appetite among global traders shows no sign of waning. As long as Chinese technology companies generate headlines and traditional access remains constrained, perpetual futures are likely to serve as a preferred tool for those willing to accept the leverage and volatility that come with them.
RELATED STORIES
Spot something wrong? Email editor@briefasia.com. We log every correction publicly.



